WHY?

“I have asked the colleagues to present the results clearly, but not to interpret them,” reports veteran science editor Nigel Calder on his blog. Why?

Because, Heuer says, “That would go immediately into the highly political arena of the climate change debate. One has to make clear that cosmic radiation is only one of many parameters.”

Source

Really starting to get sick on all this crap!

Full Conversation Here:

Welt Online: The results of the so-called CLOUD experiment, exploring the formation of clouds, are awaited with great excitement. Could these results still be important for understanding global climate change?
Heuer: This is indeed a matter of understanding better the formation of clouds. In nature there are many parameters at work – including temperature, humidity, impurities and also cosmic radiation. In the experiment, CLOUD investigates the influence of cosmic rays on cloud formation, using radiation [meaning particles] coming from the accelerator. And in an experimental chamber one can study, under controlled conditions, how the formation of droplets depends on the radiation and particulate matter. The results will be published shortly. I have asked the colleagues to present the results clearly, but not to interpret them. That would go immediately into the highly political arena of the climate change debate. One has to make clear that cosmic radiation is only one of many parameters.

Below is a compilation of news polls showing people for or against a carbon tax

SMH

Herlardsun - Click to open article

Sunshine Coast Daily

The Age

Courier

Galaxy poll

Mail

2gb

The Satellite

All the informatino below is copied from http://www.notoriouslyconservative.com/2009/03/global-warming-hoax-refuted.html

I have done a straight copy and paste because this information seems to disappear from time to time :-/

The following charts are from the Heartland Institute sponsored, 2009 International Conference on Climate Change in New York, (you wont see these in the news)

This one, by Dennis Avery, puts the climate swings of the last 12,000 years (i.e., since the last Ice Age) in perspective.

This one, by Syun Akasofu, also takes a long-term view, and compares the politically-driven prediction by the UN’s IPCC with the historical trend as the earth has recovered from the Little Ice Age.

Don Easterbrook makes the basic point that, contrary to the hysterical predictions of the alarmists, the earth is cooling, not warming.

This one by Dennis Avery shows the lack of any correlation between atmospheric CO2 and temperatures in the atmosphere.

Don Easterbrook compares the correlations of solar activity and CO2 concentration to temperature. It seems pretty obvious where the explanation for fluctuations in temperature lies.

Tim Flannery, the Commissioner for Climate Change (Appointed by the Labour Government) said on radio on Friday,“If the world as a whole cut all emissions tomorrow the average temperature of the planet is not going to drop in several hundred years, perhaps as much as a thousand years…”.

Source Source

The Gillard Government still wants Australians to pay a “Carbon Tax” at an attempt to curb man made Carbon Dioxide ?

So basically its not going to make a difference, he said “If the world as a whole cut *ALL* emissions” the only way that will happen is if we go to the 1500′s and eat raw food and freeze to death because we can’t use fire.

Lets say for example the whole word jumps on board tomorrow what happens when there is a volcano? do we have to add another 1000 years??

Doesn’t make sense.

TIME FOR A REFERENDUM !!!

I want to start by saying that I know the MSM and Government lies, but experiencing the event first hand and then watching what the news was reporting is a big eye opener.
The news and the Australian Government is calling protesters “Extremist”, “Violent”, “resembled the Tea Party demonstrations in the US,” “had all the credibility of “a Dungeons and Dragons convention” and many more.

The truth is it was ordinary Australians from all walks of life who are sick of the Australian Labour Government lying to them, they want to voice their opinion and they want the Government to start listening.

The out come we are after is a vote on the Carbon Tax or even better a re-election, we want a choice!

The people at the rally are representing the majority (not minority) of the Australian People.

View of the crowd from Parliament house

The Gillard Government is claiming that a carbon tax is going to save the world, it will stop climate change, stop the seas from rising.. blah blah I never knew a Tax had that sort of power??!!
All this tax is going to do is dramatically increase the cost of living for all Australians and send more and more of our jobs overseas, it will destroy the Australian economy.

Wycky with Angry Anderson @ No Carbon Tax Rally

All in all I thought it was a great day, I spoke to a lot people and made some new friends.
Noting violent happened it was a peaceful protest, we only used our mouths and not our fist.
There was approx 3000-4000 people at the protest.
The day was hosted by Angry Anderson and had numerous politicians speaking including Tony Abbott and a few scientist and Chris Smith.

Federal Police Officer Picking his nose

Dear Mr Dick Smith,

In Response to your offer of 1 Million Dollars to reduce population -

The Wilberforce Award, and the $1 million prize, will go to a young Australian under 30 who can impress Mr Smith by coming up with alternatives to “our population and consumption growth-obsessed economy”.

Source

Your going about this the wrong way, population reduction is not the answer, every person on this planet has the right to have any size family as they wish. As human beings we need to change lifestyles and resource consumption if we wish to continue increasing our population or to sustain our current population.

Lets take a look at some of the issues the planet is facing if we continue on our current path.

Land Mass

Land mass is not a problem – you could give every person living on the planet (approx 6.7billion people) a home on  a 1/4 acre block and it still wouldn’t even fill Australia. So we know land mass is not a problem, the problem is getting people out of the cities that is where all the congestion is.

Will reducing the population solve this problem?

Well…. yes it will ease congestion in the city, but is it the correct answer…NO. What we should be doing is pushing people out of the city into rural areas or at least the outskirts of the City Metro areas. Instead of Governments spending billions of dollars increasing / upgrading cities infrastructure they should be rewarding small business, corporations, Doctors etc to open stores / business / practices outside the cities. This will not only make the rural areas more attractive to potential residents but will also bring more money into the communities and local councils, at the same time easing congestion in the cities.

Resources

Food and Water – Our 2 most important necessities for survival (apart from oxygen) , if we keep relying on shopping centres for these necessities then yes there is going to be a problem unless we cap our population, but as the example I have given above if every body as a 1/4 acre you can grow your own fruit and veg and collect your own rain water  you don’t need to go to a shopping centre to survive. Also take in to consideration the food you will be eating will be much more nutritious, no pesticide’s, no growth enhancements, not genetically modified in anyway (unlike what we consume now) .

Oil - This is unfortunately our most import resource (apart from food and water) yet it shouldn’t be. Oil has been used for decades for fuel and power, there has been plenty of alternatives that just get swept under the rug   because the oil companies have to big of a hold on this planet and wont allow these alternatives to be released – Just to name a couple:

• The Electric Car: There are a few Hybrids out at the moment yet back in 1931 Nikola Tesla ran a car solely on electricity, It didn’t even need batteries because it ran on wireless electricity (Imagine where the world would be today if this technology was not suppressed by the 3 asses – Morgan, Rockefeller and Ford).
• The Hydrogen Car: There are a few Hydrogen “Fuel Cell” cars in development at the moment, the only problem is fuelling them because service stations are yet to supply hydrogen last time I checked. The secret is we do not need Hydrogen “fuel cells” you can make hydrogen yourself all you need is water, a power source and a conductive metal. The first hydrogen motor was built back in 1807 in Switzerland, and in 1941 during WWII the Nazi’s converted 200 trucks to run on solely on Hydrogen, yet here we are 203 years since the first cleaner and more efficent engine was built and yet we are still using  dirty and out dated methods of fuel????   WHY??????????!!!!!!!!!!!?????????????

Power – There are plenty of alternative methods to power; solar is a great one to have on your home it just needs more research put into solar absorption and storing power until then it is not reliable enough to be your only source of power. We still have tidal, hydro and thermo energy. Combinations of these 4 natural power sources will do fine powering any country. But the fact is all of these power sources still need more research into the most efficient methods of abstracting power from them. Have a think of all the billions of dollars (spent around the world) of our money and years put into research on climate change…… and what was the answer to solve all our problems… lets tax the citizens!! that will save the environment.

Now just stop for 1 sec and  imagine if  all those years and billions of dollars was actually put to good use (instead of scamming the public) and went towards researching the above mentioned technologies and we actually had a natural unlimited source of power??

So Dick, as you can see from my few examples given above a population cap is not the correct answer to solve our planet’s problems. The answer is people and need to change, there needs to be a paradigm shift and we need to take the power away from the greedy, money hungry and corrupt oil tycoons because really the only thing stopping this planet from advancing is greed and money.

Regards,

Wycky

Gore-Backed Car Firm Gets Large U.S. Loan

WASHINGTON — A tiny car company backed by former Vice President Al Gore has just gotten a $529 million U.S. government loan to help build a hybrid sports car in Finland that will sell for about $89,000.

So US tax payers give Al Gore $529m which get invested in Finland so its not even creating jobs in the US??

Gore’s Dual Role: Advocate and Investor

Mr. Gore and his partners decided to back the company, and in gratitude Silver Spring retained him and John Doerr, another Kleiner Perkins partner, as unpaid corporate advisers.

The deal appeared to pay off in a big way last week, when the Energy Department announced $3.4 billion in smart grid grants. Of the total, more than $560 million went to

utilities with which Silver Spring has contracts. Kleiner Perkins and its partners, including Mr. Gore, could recoup their investment many times over in coming years.

Silver Spring’s head office is based in Canada and a 2nd office in Australia

So far that is 1 US billion tax dollars given to Al gore “backed Companies” and does not benefit Americans at all. Oh but you will get to purchase a car for $89,000 and the profits go back to Finland

Oh and look Al Gore Set To Become First “Carbon Billionaire”

Anyone who thinks Al Gore is not a con man and Man Made Global Warming is real should have “Tool” stamped across their forehead.

This article speaks for itself. This has been going on for a while, new books and teaching in school has all been altered to suite the Climate Change Conspiracy and now Wikipedia has been busted erasing previous entries or entries about the truth of climate change and tailored 5000 entries to suie the agenda.

History of climate gets ‘erased’ online

More than 5,000 entries tailored to hype global-warming agenda

A new report reveals a British scientist and Wikipedia administrator rewrote climate history, editing more than 5,000 unique articles in the online encyclopedia to cover traces of a medieval warming period – something Climategate scientists saw as a major roadblock in the effort to spread the global warming message.

Recently hacked e-mails from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit expose a plot to eliminate the Medieval Warm Period, a 400-year era that began around A.D. 1000, the Financial Post’s Lawrence Solomon reports.

The warming period is said to have improved agriculture and increased life spans, but scientists at the center of the Climategate e-mail scandal believed the era undermined their goal of spreading concern about global warming as it pertains to today’s climate.

Solomon noted the warming period presented a dilemma long before the Climategate e-mail scandal.

A 1995 e-mail predating the recent Climate Research Unit scandal was sent to geophysicist David Deming. A major climate-change researcher told Deming, “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”

Some scientists later expressed concern about erasing the period.

The video below shows a journalist, Phelim McAleer, asking a question to Professor Schneider at  Copenhagen  in a completely professional manner about the Climate Gate emails and then some (good looking) drone / employee walks up to him try to take is microphone away, and he then gets hounded by an armed UN security guard and does not get to finish  questioning Professor Schneider.

This video is a good example that they are still keeping the truth from the people and anybody who is apart of or in support of Copenhagen and carbon taxes is either:

1. Corrupt
2. Brain washed
3. Dumb
4. All Of The Above